As the Supreme Court prepares to deliver its verdict today on the contentious interpretation of Article 97(1) of the Constitution, thought voices are urging caution and broader engagement beyond the court’s decision.
Clement Akoloh, Communications Director of Parliamentary Network Affair has emphasized that the outcome may not be sufficient to fully resolve the parliamentary impasse.
In an interview with ABC News GH this morning, Akoloh highlighted the importance of fostering dialogue among stakeholders to ensure stability and functionality within Parliament.
“They are his children. So we expect that the Speaker will leverage that, to bring the rest around the table to have a discussion to have a smooth parliament,” said Akoloh, referring to Speaker Alban Bagbin’s pivotal role.
He argued that while the legal ruling will provide guidance, it may not bridge the divide that has disrupted parliamentary operations and, by extension, governance.
Akoloh further underscored that, regardless of the Supreme Court’s pronouncement, there needs to be a concerted effort involving national bodies such as the Council of State and the Peace Council.
“Despite everything that happens today, we should have other national bodies like the Council of State, the Peace Council, and all meaningful organizations and governance institutions to try and engage with Parliament, the Speaker, and leadership to ensure that from here we have a smooth sailing parliament,” he added.
The case, which stems from Speaker Bagbin’s declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant, has escalated tensions within the legislative arm and raised questions about democratic procedures.
The absence of the Speaker’s legal team in court further complicated proceedings, drawing criticism from Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame.
The ruling will be watched closely, not just for its immediate legal impact but for how it shapes the legislative landscape going forward.
